Best ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Study Material | ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Sims

Blog Article

Tags: Best ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Study Material, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Sims, Latest ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Test Guide, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Details, Certification ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Training

Our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor learning guide are developed in three versions which are the PDF, Software and APP online versions. The PDF version of ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor training materials is convenient for you to print, the software version can provide practice test for you and the online version of our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Study Materials is for you to read anywhere at any time. If you are hesitating about which version should you choose, you can download our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor free demo first to get a firsthand experience before you make any decision.

Our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice questions are specialized in providing our customers with the most reliable and accurate exam guide and help them pass their exams by achieve their satisfied scores. With our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor study materials, your exam will be a piece of cake. We have a lasting and sustainable cooperation with customers who are willing to purchase our actual exam. We try our best to renovate and update our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor learning guide in order to help you fill the knowledge gap during your learning process, thus increasing your confidence and success rate.

>> Best ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Study Material <<

ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Sims & Latest ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Test Guide

We are concentrating on the reform on the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam material that our candidates try to get aid with. We own the profession experts on compiling the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice questions and customer service on giving guide on questions from our clients. Our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Preparation materials contain three versions: the PDF, the Software and the APP online. They give you different experience on trying out according to your interests and hobbies. And they can assure your success by precise information.

PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Sample Questions (Q22-Q27):

NEW QUESTION # 22
According to the core element of 'Privacy and Security,' what is essential when developing AI systems?

A. Reducing the development time
B. Increasing the efficiency of AI algorithms
C. Enhancing the graphical user interface
D. Ensuring the protection of personal data and system security

Answer: D

Explanation:
ThePrivacy and Securityprinciple focuses on safeguardingpersonal dataand ensuring therobustness of AI systems against security threats.
As outlined inISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 6.1.2 and 8.2.3, organizations must addressdata protection, cybersecurity, and access controlsthroughout the AI system lifecycle.
This is particularly relevant in contexts where AI systems handlesensitive or identifiable data, such as health, finance, or biometrics.

NEW QUESTION # 23
Scenario 9:
Scenario 9: Securisai, located in Tallinn.Estonia, specializes in the development of automated cybersecurity solutions that utilize AIsystems. The company recently implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS in accordance with ISO/IEC 42001. Indoing so, the company aimed to manage its Al-driven systems' capabilities to detect and mitigate cyber threats more efficiently andethically. As part of its commitment to upholding the highest standards of Al use and management, Securisai underwent a certificationaudit to demonstrate compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
The audit process comprised two main stages: the initial or stage 1 audit focused on reviewing Securisai's documentation, policies, andprocedures related to its AIMS. This review laid the groundwork for the stage 2 audit, which involved a comprehensive, on-site evaluation of the actual implementation and effectiveness of the AIMS within Securisai's operations. The goal was to observe the AIMS in operation,ensuring that it not only existed on paper but was effectively integrated into the company's daily activities and cybersecurity strategies.
After the audit, Roger, Securisai's internal auditor, addressed the action plans devised to rectify nonconformities identified during thecertification audit. He developed a long term strategy, highlighting key AIMS processes for triennial audits. Roger's internal audits play a key role in advancing Securisai's goals by employing a systematic and disciplined method to assess and boost the efficiency of risk management, governance processes, and strategic decision-making. Roger reported his findings directly to Securisai's top management.
Following the successful rectification of nonconformities, Securisai was officially certified against ISO/IEC
42001.
Recently, the company decided to transfer its ISO/IEC 42001 certification registration from one certification body to another despitebeing initially bound by a long-term agreement with the current certification body.
This decision was motivated by the desire to partnerwith a certification body that offers deeper insights and expertise in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence in cybersecurity.
To ensure a smooth transition and copyright its certification status, Securisai is diligently compiling the required documentation forsubmission to the new certification body. This includes a formal request, the most recent audit report underscoring its adherence toISO/IEC 42001, the latest corrective action plan that highlights its continuous efforts toward improvement, and a copy of its current validcertification registration.
A year following Securisai's initial certification audit, a subsequent audit was carried out by the certification body on its AIMS. The purpose of this audit was to assess compliance with ISO/IEC 42001 and verify the ongoing improvement of the AIMS. The audit team concluded that Securisai's AIMS consistently meets the requirements set by ISO/IEC 42001.
Question:
Roger followed up on action plans resulting from external audits. Is this acceptable?

A. No, it is the responsibility of the external auditor to follow up on action plans resulting from external audits
B. Yes, the internal auditor should follow up on action plans submitted during internal and external audits
C. No, the internal auditor should follow up on action plans submitted in response to nonconformities resulting only from internal audits

Answer: B

Explanation:
It isacceptableand even advisable for internal auditors to monitor bothinternalandexternal audit findingsto ensure the system's ongoing effectiveness.
* ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.2states:"Internal audits shall ensure the AIMS conforms to both the organization's own requirements and the requirements of the standard, including actions arising from external audits."
* ISO 19011:2018 Clause 5.5allows internal auditors to verify that corrective actions from all sources (internal and external audits) are implemented effectively.
Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.2; ISO 19011:2018 Clause 5.5.

NEW QUESTION # 24
An audit team member is tasked with evaluating a sophisticated AI system used for autonomous driving. They lack the necessary expertise but proceed without consulting a specialist. Which principle is being neglected in this scenario?

A. Confidentiality
B. Independence
C. Integrity
D. Due Professional Care

Answer: D

Explanation:
The principle being neglected isDue Professional Care.
According toISO 19011:2018 - Clause 4(f), auditors are expected to applydiligence, competence, and judgmentduring audit activities. If an auditor proceeds with an auditwithout the required expertise, especially for a high-risk system like autonomous driving, this violates the principle of due care.
ThePECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 3clearly states that in complex technical environments (such as AI or autonomous systems), auditors mustseek assistance from domain specialistswhen they lack direct experience.

NEW QUESTION # 25
Scenario 4 (continued):
BioNovaPharm, a German biopharmaceutical company, has implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMSbased on ISO/IEC 42001 to optimize various aspects of drug discovery, including analyzing extensive biological data, identifying potentialdrug candidates, and streamlining clinical trial processes. After having the AIMS in place for over a year, the company contracted acertification body and is now undergoing an AIMS audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 42001.
Adopting a risk-based approach, the audit team focused on risk throughout their activities. The level of detail outlined in the audit plancorresponded to the scope and complexity of the audit. The team employed a ranking system for detailed audit procedures, prioritizingthose with the highest risk.
Once the stage 1 audit began, the audit team started reviewing the auditee's documented information. To assess whether BioNovaPharmcomplies with the legal and regulatory requirements related to incident communication, the audit team examined evidence provided bythe company's external legal office. The evidence confirmed that BioNovaPharm applies the requirements of the EU Al Act, whichmandates that providers of high-risk Al systems report serious incidents to relevant authorities.
Following the completion of the stage 1 audit, John, an audit team member, documented the stage 1 audit outputs, including theobservations of the audit team that could result in nonconformities during the on-site audit. However, the audit team leader, Emma, whowas overseeing the audit activities, observed that John failed to document significant observations related to the lack of transparency inthe Al decision-making processes of BioNovaPharm. Considering that Emma observed John's lack of competence in undertaking some audit activities, a disciplinary note was recorded for John.
Question:
Based on Scenario 4, does the level of detail in the audit plan adequately reflect all aspects recommended for a comprehensive risk-based approach to planning?

A. No, the audit plan should have focused on nonconformities only
B. Yes, the amount of detail provided in the audit plan reflects all the necessary aspects
C. No, the audit plan should have included sufficient detail correlating with the risk of not achieving the audit objectives
D. No, detailed audit procedures should have been prioritized based on the level of risk, from lowest to highest

Answer: C

Explanation:
The audit plan should correlate directly withthe risk of not achieving the audit objectives, meaning higher- risk areas need more scrutiny.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1 and ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 9.2.1 emphasize that audit planning must berisk-based, addressing critical risk areas sufficiently to meet audit objectives.
* Lead Auditor TrainingModule 3 highlights:"An audit plan must be sufficiently detailed based on risks to ensure critical activities receive proportionate audit attention." Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.1; ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1.

NEW QUESTION # 26
Scenario 7 (continued):
Scenario 7: ICure, headquartered in Bratislava, is a medical institution known for its use of the latest technologies in medical practices. Ithas introduced groundbreaking Al-driven diagnostics and treatment planning tools that have fundamentally transformed patient care.
ICure has integrated a robust artificial intelligence management system AIMS to manage its Alsystems effectively. This holisticmanagement framework ensures that ICure's Al applications are not only developed but also deployed and maintained to adhere to the highest industry standards, thereby enhancing efficiency and reliability.
ICure has initiated a comprehensive auditing process to validate its AIMS's effectiveness in alignment with ISO/IEC 42001. The stage 1audit involved an on-site evaluation by the audit team. The team evaluated the site-specific conditions, interacted with ICure's personnel, observed the deployed technologies, and reviewed the operations that support the AIMS. Following these observations, the findings weredocumented and communicated to ICure. setting the stage for subsequent actions.
Unforeseen delays and resource allocation issues introduced a significant gap between the completion of stage
1 and the onset of stage2 audits. This interval, while unplanned, provided an opportunity for reflection and preparation for upcoming challenges.
After four months, the audit team initiated the stage 2 audit. They evaluated AIMS's compliance with ISO
/IEC 42001 requirements, payingspecial attention to the complexity of processes and their documentation. It was during this phase that a critical observation was made:
ICure had not fully considered the complexity of its processes and their interactions when determining the extent of documentedinformation. Essential processes related to Al model training, validation, and deployment were not documented accurately, hinderingeffective control and management of these critical activities. This issue was recorded as a minor nonconformity, signaling a need forenhanced control and management of these vital activities.
Simultaneously, the auditor evaluated the appropriateness and effectiveness of the "AIMS Insight Strategy," a procedure developed by ICure to determine the AIMS internal and external challenges. This examination identified specific areas for improvement, particularly in the way stakeholder input was integrated into the system. It highlighted how this could significantly enhance the contribution of relevant parties in strengthening the system's resilience and effectiveness.
The audit team determined the audit findings by taking into consideration the requirements of ICure, the previous audit records and conclusions, the accuracy, sufficiency, and appropriateness of evidence, the extent to which planned audit activities are realized and planned results achieved, the sample size, and the categorization of the audit findings. The audit team decided to first record all the requirements met; then they proceeded to record the nonconformities.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Question:
Which clause did the audit team evaluate when assessing the appropriateness of the "AIMS Insight Strategy" procedure?

A. Clause 4.3 Determining the scope of the AI management system
B. Clause 4.1 Understanding the organization and its context
C. Clause 5.2 AI policy

Answer: B

Explanation:
The"AIMS Insight Strategy"refers to ICure's method for identifying internal and external challenges, which maps directly toClause 4.1.
* ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 4.1requires organizations to determine external and internal issues relevant to the AIMS, including stakeholder needs and challenges.
* TheLead Auditor Manualstates:"Clause 4.1 focuses on environmental, regulatory, technological, and organizational factors that affect AI operations and should be addressedthrough strategic tools like insight strategies." Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 4.1; Lead Auditor Study Guide Module 2.

NEW QUESTION # 27
......

When you are preparing ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice exam, it is necessary to grasp the overall knowledge points of real exam by using the latest ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor pass guide. Our experts written the accurate ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor test answers for exam preparation and created the study guideline for our candidates. We promise you will get high passing mark with our valid ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Torrent and your money will be back to your account if you failed exam with our study materials.

ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Sims: https://www.actualvce.com/PECB/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor-valid-vce-dumps.html

To achieve this objective the ActualVCE is offering top-rated, real, and updated ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam (ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor) exam questions in three different formats, PECB Best ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Study Material In the meanwhile, you can enjoy the best service in our company, The client can try out our and download ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor guide materials freely before the sale and if the client have problems about our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor study materials after the sale they can contact our customer service at any time, So it is undeniable that our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice materials are useful and effective.

Friedman, Elliot B, A focus on process provides the infrastructure and stability ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor necessary to deal with an ever-changing world and to maximize the productivity of people and the use of technology to be more competitive.

Unparalleled Best ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Study Material for Real Exam

The client can try out our and download ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor guide materials freely before the sale and if the client have problems about our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor study materials after the sale they can contact our customer service at any time.

So it is undeniable that our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice materials are useful and effective, For assistance with PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam preparation and practice, ActualVCE offers its users three formats.

Report this page

BEST ISO-IEC-42001-LEAD-AUDITOR STUDY MATERIAL | ISO-IEC-42001-LEAD-AUDITOR EXAM SIMS

Best ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Study Material | ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Sims